On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 10:41 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I don't think it's bad for exim to groupadd 93 first, but honestly I > don't know what happens to existing installations that may have a > different GID set up and I don't want to break anything. I guess such > systems would be running rawhide and this is a bug fix, so.... Existing installations wouldn't be doing the groupadd/useradd. That should only be done on the first install of the package. We just fixed this for dbus too, as it was breaking things by having a dynamically installed group id, so yea I think there was a behavioral change in shadow stuff. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
