On Wednesday, 29 July 2009 at 15:47, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:39 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > <snip> > > It's quite hypocritical of you to use an "anti-open-source" company > > (Creative) as an argument for not supporting hw mixing on one side > > and then touting other "anti-open-source" companies as examples to > > follow on the other. > > Since when does using technology as an example mean that you condone the > way companies do business? Ask Lennart. I only took his argument to its logical conclusion. > Maybe we should start removing other parts of > Fedora because they were inspired by, or share similar technical > features to things Microsoft or Apple did before us. Ah, so dropping support for hw mixing is a great innovation. > I hope you see how flawed your argument is. It was more of a ridicule than anything else. > > But whatever. Just please stop imposing pulseaudio on those who don't > > want to use it. For the record, I'm still considering leaving Fedora > > because - as a GNOME desktop - it's becoming unusable without pulseaudio. > > Making it a hard dependency for GNOME bluetooth stack in F11 went a bit > > too far in my opinion. > > I did that, and the reasons for it were discussed on this list. Nobody > has made any headway into explaining how to fix the problem[1] without > the hard dependency. > > [1]: That'd be out-of-the-box Bluetooth headset and speakers support While having support for stuff like that is great, I still would like to be able to remove pulseaudio (even it it means losing support for bluetooth headsets and speakers) without losing the rest of gnome-bluetooth. What was the problem with that? Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
