On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 10:17 -0400, Doug Warner wrote: > On 07/27/2009 04:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > So what do people want out of a Fedora Mini SIG? > > I recently got a Asus eee Pc 1005HA which was almost entirely supported > out-of-the-box with F11 (awesome!). I had to install via DVD-to-USB stick > since network didn't work in anaconda, but otherwise worked great once installed. > > I'd like to see a couple things: > * support for different "skins" which are easily installable from packages > (Ubuntu NBR's gnome view, moblin, etc) UNR's UIs are a dead-end. I'd advise sticking to Moblin, even if we made slight changes compared to upstream (using mutter for both gnome-shell and moblin usage would be good). > * integration of Dan Walsh's xguest package with easy-to-customize guest > defaults (which skin to use from above, default firefox > preferences/extensions, etc) What's the use of this? > * firefox: make meerkat extension [1] available and activated on install Is there any actual way to package Firefox extensions for Fedora? That would probably make my installs of Firebug more up-to-date... But making sure that applications work well on smaller screens is a case for either adding support directly in the applications when possible, or creating a proper front-end for it. > These are just some quick ideas I've had while using my netbook since I've had > it for the past week. > > I'm not sure of the status of Ubuntu's NBR gnome skin (ie, where it's housed, > how to package it, etc) but it would be great to get into Fedora. A number of those are already in Fedora, a few more are up for review, but things like maximus are gross hacks, and we shouldn't be building a desktop on top of hacks like that. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
