Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Farkas Levente wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>fc1->fc2
> >>fc6->fc7
> >>rhel4->rhel5
> >>
> >>It's not new.
> >
> >just to be correct neither fc6->fc7 nor rhel4->rhel5 break any system 
> >tools! and i don't remember to fc1->fc2.
> >
> 
> fc6->fc7 had a couple of fun metadata breaks
> rhel4->rhel5 upgrades are neither supported (iirc) nor likely to work 
> consistently in my experience b/c of how much things changed between them.

A live in place RHEL upgrade via something like 'yum' may not be supported,
but I believe that an Anaconda based upgrade is fully supported. Though
'supported' might include you having to redo customizations to config
files & the like.

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux