On 07/24/2009 04:55 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > I don't think I explained it well. I was thinking what if you had this rule: > > -A INPUT -Z cups_t -j ACCEPT > > and then cups was compromised and started listening on port 80. Since the > above rule has no port restrictions and cups is allowed to accept connections, > would cups now be able to start serving web pages? > > -Steve That would be a bad rule. The Apache example I posted only makes sense because Apache can be listening on pretty much any port anyway (every http deployment I see is stranger than the last). For cups it is a lot rarer for an admin to configure a strange port, so we'd want to combine -Z with further rules like port and host restrictions. --CJD -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
