Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:40:04 +0100,
  Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Constructive suggestion for the next cycle - we should go back to a
> shorter gap between Feature Freeze and GA.

Isn't development for the N+2 release supposed to start at the branch point
and not GA of N+1? I think that is likely to happen at alpha (formerly
known as beta) this time around.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux