2009/7/26 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me.
perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for nopaste as Jason Farell mentoined in Bug #504108 Comment 10 before
nopaste is back...
http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1
you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste..
the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me.
perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for nopaste as Jason Farell mentoined in Bug #504108 Comment 10 before
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
