On 07/26/2009 01:52 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Sunday 26 July 2009 01:47:55 pm Richard Fearn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just had an EL-5 branch created for my disktype[1] package. The >> new branch is a copy of the devel branch, so the NVR is currently >> disktype-9-5. >> >> Should I build the package as-is (so the first EPEL version is 9-5), >> or clear the changelog and start from 9-1 again for the EL-5 branch? >> >> I looked on a few pages[2][3][4] for information on this, but couldn't >> see anything. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rich >> >> [1]: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/disktype >> [2]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_CVS_FAQ_for_package_maintainers >> [3]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure >> [4]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies > > There is nothing wrong with starting at 9-5. > Using the disttag can make it clearer that a package comes from epel as opposed to someone installing the Fedora package onto an EL-5 system and expecting it to work. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
