On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Alan Cox<alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > all these symptoms sound like your upgrade went horribly wrong. I've seen > preupgrade mash up a box by half upgrading like that. It's the main reason > I don't think preupgrade is actually safe to use yet. My first thought is...who in the community is standing up and taking the responsibility as the front line testers of preupgrade during the pre-release process? I admit I don't test or make us of it (and thus I don't feel I'm qualified to comment on how well it functions nor do I tell people to use it because I do not use it myself)...as I prefer fresh installs so that I can experience the default configuration which can change significantly from release to release. Do we need some affirmative me-too tabulation on the install scenarios to get an idea of how much testing each method is getting? If preupgrade is seeing only 1% of the DVD installer testing would it help to publicly expose that as encouragement for more people to test preupgrade? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
