Re: Any consensus on a groupware suite for FC/RHEL?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On tor, 2004-07-22 at 10:58 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 07:32, Jos Vos wrote:
> > Is there any sight on a choice of a "preferred groupware suite" to
> > be included in future releases of FC/RHEL, like OpenGroupware.org
> > or one of the other groupware projects?
> > 
> 
> We don't have a lot of Red Hat internal motion toward hacking on these
> right now, mostly because it doesn't look like any of these packages are
> mature/scalable enough for enterprise customers without a lot of work.
> 
> There was some discussion on the lists (fedora-desktop maybe) a while
> back comparing the various options.
> 
> However, this doesn't mean that the Fedora Project can't include one of
> these projects. If someone starts on packaging for Fedora Extras now
> then once we get external cvs etc. (any time now) we could move one of
> them to Fedora Core I imagine, if there's consensus, etc.

Harald Hoyer has been packaging OpenGroupware.org for quite a while:

http://people.redhat.com/harald/ogo/

Perhaps that could serve as a base for FE package(s)? 

/Peter

-- 
Peter Backlund <peter.backlund@xxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux