Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 04:41:53PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> md /boot is definitely broken, has been for ages and the bugs don't seem
> to have been touched. It's also obvious nobody bothered to actually test
> that case because the error paths in the install code don't actually
> work for that case either !

I always set up my md /boot manually and it works fine after that.

> Fortunately the usual updating fedora-release, yum upgrade approach
> worked on my boxes. I'd avoid preupgrade anyway it seems to like breaking
> systems and leaving them half upgraded so you have to rescue the mess by
> hand.

I don't even upgrade anymore.  I just keep two partitions (Logical 
Volumes actually)--one for Fedora N and one for Fedora N+1.  I always 
do a fresh install, formatting the partition from the older install.  
This has the advantage of providing a backup in case the new Fedora 
doesn't work so well.  Eventually, when updates to the new Fedora fix 
the most annoying bugs, I switch to using it full time.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux