On 7/21/09 1:35 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 07/21/2009 12:06 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:11 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
[snip]
Orphan: pcmanx-gtk2
gnash-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
gnome-chemistry-utils-mozplugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
mozilla-opensc-signer requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
swfdec-mozilla requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Umm.... What???
Sigh. pcmanx-gtk2.spec includes:
# We need to own this dir, because we don't want to Requires: firefox
%{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins/
I think not.
The package already "Requires: xulrunner"; which requires
mozilla-filesystem, which is what owns %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins.
Yeah, that predates mozilla-filesystem. pcmanx-gtk2 is safe to die if no
one wants it (although, having a telnet client plugin for firefox is
somewhat cool).
This does actually bring up a more general issue.
webkitgtk doesn't depend on mozilla-filesystem; should it?
NPAPI plug-ins ought to have a dependency that can be satisfied by any
NPAPI container. Does Fedora need to define such a thing?
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
