-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: >> Ingvar Hagelund wrote: >>> If anyone are interested in the packages, they are available from >>> http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/06/11/amarok-14-for- fedora-11/ > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Greg Trounsonwrote: >> Thank you Ingvar. After using Amarok 2 for a couple of months I'm convinced >> it has a long way to go before it comes near Amarok 1.4 in terms of >> features, usability and robustness. > > Thanks, > Actually, I also feel amarok 2.0 has a long way to go. I feel that > Amarok is another good opensource product turning into a crappy one. > > Amarok 1.4's features : ipod support and cuesheet support are missing > in the 2.0 version since a long time and upstream is not giving enough > love to them. cuesheet is broken release after release while upstream > is claiming better cuesheet support in their release notes. Sadly. > > Chitlesh > Someone stated that 2.2 got the look-and-feel of 1.4 as an option. Maybe you'd like to try that? Currently would need build-from-source. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpkld4ACgkQiPi+MRHG3qSXOgCfV4G4ZhDG4hHtIPK3NrcZpi/B y6QAoIfBbPOhDSO6xTkzwIkpHK+7Qdvq =2fYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
