On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 11:34 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:27:22 -0400, Tim Daly <daly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/21/btg_sues_apple_microsoft/ > > Considering that the patents in question are not referenced in that > article... there is precious little to actually think about or comment > on. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,557,054.WKU.&OS=PN/6,557,054&RS=PN/6,557,054 I'm pretty sure there's prior art. Regards, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Duke University Physics
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
