Re: Updates and delays in signing packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/18/2009 03:11 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Rahul
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a concern with the recent delays in signing packages and how best
>> to handle that. I maintain Gnote in Fedora. This is very actively
>> maintained and has frequent releases, even weekly. It is also a rather
>> young project (original release in Apr 1) and I do get bug reports on
>> crashes and other issues that are better fixed quickly. I prefer not to
>> push things directly to stable repository. With the recommended time of
>> 7 days in updates-testing and the delay in signing the package for that
>> and signing it for updates repo, the package gets obsoleted by Bodhi
>> with the next release update.  What would be the best way to handle this?
> 
> You don't have to push _every_ upstream release as an update.

Was I not clear? In my case, I do often have to. They fix important bugs.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux