Re: Does anything require /proc/bus/usb?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Why not patch VirtualBox to do it correctly?
>
> Why not patch your utilities?

You want to change something which is not broken and requests that I adapt
my workflow and spent work into something to retain old functionality?


> Again: The issue is not VirtualBox.

VirtualBox seems to be the issue.  Or do you have other examples of
software which uses crappy heuristics based upon the existence of
/proc/bus/usb?


Enrico

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux