On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:16:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 17:10 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:42:56AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > > If not, should it be phased out? > > > > > > I'm referencing a use case with VirtualBox that looks for /proc/bus/usb > > > by default and will use that instead of libusb for USB device access. > > > This has caused issues for people wishing to use VirtualBox on Fedora in > > > that they cannot use USB devices without a little tinkering. They either > > > have to remove the /proc/bus/usb mount from rc.sysinit or adjust their > > > fstab to allow other users access. > > > > Why not do a patch for VirtualBox to make it look in the right place > > first ? > > Because we don't package VirtualBox, because it requires not-in-tree > kernel modules. I know that, but that doesn't prevent motivated people sending a patch to rpmfusion, or virtualbox upstream to solve this problem. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
