On Thursday 16 July 2009 12:07:42 pm Doug Warner wrote: > On 07/16/2009 12:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Thursday 16 July 2009 09:51:32 am Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 16:32, Rick L. Vinyard, > >> Jr.<rvinyard@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > >>> I've built the following package on Fedora 10 and 11 in mock without > >>> any problems. > >>> http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini-9.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm > >>> > >>> However, when I try and build for EPEL 5 using mock on a F11 machine I > >>> get the following in root.log: > >>> > >>> DEBUG util.py:256: error: unpacking of archive failed on file > >>> /builddir/build/SOURCES/MINI-9.0.3.zip;4a5f3532: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch > >>> > >>> Any suggestions? > >> > >> I did the following two days ago (all on a F11 host) : > >> - rebuild the F11 srpm in a F10 mock chroot > >> - rebuild the F10 srpm in a EL5 mock chroot > >> > >> F11 and F10 rpm versions are compatible, and so are F10 and EL5. > >> > >> Totally suboptimal, but it works, and I didn't have time to search > >> more thoroughly for a better solution :) > > > > just for this type of thing i added a new script to fedora-packager > > rpmbuild- md5 it creates rpms/srpms with the old style hashes. its a > > simple bash script that is a wrapper around rpmbuild with the defines for > > old style hashes. the fedora-packager with it is in updates-testing. > > Would it be possible to update the mock configs with these settings as > well? > > -Doug It is nothing to do with what is in the mock configs. the issue is that if you create a srpm on F-11 or rawhide then it uses internal hashing that is not understood by anything previous. F-10 uses md5 but understands the new style also. inside the mock chroot they use what is the default for that release. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
