On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Todd Zullinger<tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ¹ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/506953 safekeep hit it. I was just starting to diagnose the problem. Do we really need to carry patches around in multiple individual projects for what is understood to be a problem in our asciidoc packaging? Really? Can't we deal with this in asciidoc packaging? So we aren't running done multiple failure to build reports? These are the packages which asciidoc's broken safe behavior. potentially impacts on packaging building. repoquery --whatrequires --archlist=src --repoid=rawhide-source asciidoc git-cola-0:1.3.8-1.fc12.src tig-0:0.14.1-1.fc11.src gegl-0:0.1.0-1.fc12.src libXi-0:1.2.99-2.20090619.fc12.src guilt-0:0.32-3.fc11.src git-0:1.6.3.3-1.fc12.src safekeep-0:1.0.5-2.fc11.src cogito-0:0.18.2-4.fc11.src sectool-0:0.9.3-1.fc12.src -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
