On 07/14/2009 10:33 AM, Dennis Gregorovic wrote: > In F11 Everything, there are 211 i386 packages without the dist tag and > just 81 noarch packages without the dist tag. So, it's definitely not > just the noarch packages that aren't using the dist tag. I didn't mean to imply that was the case. I was specifically focusing on the most common case where people don't want to use the dist tag, and the one referenced in the bugzilla ticket a few posts up in the thread. > Personally, I think that the dist tag usage should be strongly > encouraged for all packages. It makes rebuilds and upgrade easier and > the only potential downside is a small cosmetic one. I agree, and would hope that the widespread adoption of it means that others agree as well. :) ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
