Re: Feature proposal: Rebootless Installer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Douglas
McClendon<dmc.fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 If so, one way to describe the major
benefit of my rebootless installer, is that you get to boot the livecd/usb
environment, *then use it as such*, and at your option, desire, and
convenience, decide to permanently install the LiveOS you have just been
using and configuring, to disk.  And of course when done, just pop out the
livecd/usb, and your are done... and free to leave your system with a
continuingly increasing uptime :)

Wait, so it's persisting any changes you made to the target drive?

yup.

That sounds quite cool actually, and I misunderstood the original
post.  Concretely with your change, if I've connected to a wireless
network with NetworkManager, that would get saved in the target
drive's configuration in gconf and be there next time I boot?

yup.

I know with the live images one problem we have is that data can sort
of randomly disappear if you're running close to the memory limit; if

yes, and this is one motivation to possibly switch to a unionfs LiveOS architecture, which would preclude my feature from working. Note that unionfs doesn't magically defeat this problem, it just suffers differently. I.e. a different set (but similar kind) of tradeoffs, that clearly the ubuntu and lots of other folks think is better (maybe not by a lot, but by enough).

In any event, the current feature proposal does not address this (though I've suggested other ideas on fedora-livecd-list over the years on ways to mitigate the pain).

Really, the coolest way to mitigate the pain, would be if you could pass a boot cmdline flag to the kernel, such that ext3/4 would have a preference for block(?) allocation, i.e. always preferring blocks that have been used and freed, instead of blocks that had never been used. If that could be done, that would go _a long_ way in mitigating the pain of the devicemapper LiveOS architecture. But I'm getting off track of the feature under consideration...

we go with your architecture we should probably special-case things
like ~/.gconf so say the Firefox http disk cache doesn't blow away
your wireless config.

Uh... yes. And if I understand you correctly, that is not limited to my new feature, and should just be done period, because it helps out just as much for normal LiveOS usage. It would just have to be another one those things done in /etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys that my installer would have to undo at the end of installation.

peace...

-dmc


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux