Re: bchunk: dead package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 14 July 2009 03:56:34 am Michael Schwendt wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1977
>
> bchunk is said to be obsolete, because "shntool" (also in Fedora) would
> be superior. If you disagree and find a good reason to adopt bchunk, please
> find a solution for the open ticket.
>
> Originally, I had sponsored Alan Olson (alano) when he wanted to take over
> this old package in Fedora. A deal that hasn't worked out this time. The
> single bugzilla ticket (#439661)is without a response/action since over a
> year. And attempts at contacting alano via private mail and bugzilla have
> been fruitless. As such, I've removed him from the FAS Packager group, too.

>From reading the ticket[0], it looks like the Debian patch solves the issue -- 
I would like to take the package.

[0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439661

Regards,
-- 
Conrad Meyer <cemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux