Re: AMD64 package help needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Schwendt wrote:
| Occasionally, there are reports about src.rpms which fail to rebuild for
| x86_64, e.g. Gtkmm 2:
|
|   https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1421
|
| To know whether a version upgrade fixes this, requires that someone
| with an AMD64 system attempts at rebuilding it prior to release. Else
| the release process looks like
|
|   QA for x86
|    -> PUBLISH for x86
|    -> bug report about x86_64
|    -> fix and prepare update
|    -> QA for x86 (regression testing)
|    -> if fix needs modifications, try on x86_64 again
|    -> PUBLISH for x86 and x86_64
|
| and results in increased work for the packagers and reviewers.
|
| If there are people from the Fedora for AMD64 community who read this,
| please join and help!

Is this an FC2 or 3 package?


- -- csm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, head geek http://moongroup.com & http://anironline.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA/a0jv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAvCPAKCK0EvhQEz1PtJClnPO3Nkdr1OG/QCglL6j
ETrtcrTkQHn/Ex6uzA1qbBE=
=RJwl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux