On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 12:49, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 11:34, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > Indeed I cannot find an official definition of the term Open Source as > > used for the Fedora Project on the Fedora Red Hat pages or on the Fedora > > US pages. It is probably a good idea to make explicit which definition > > is used. > > We have discussed in the past using the intersection of the open source > definition from opensource.org and the free software definition from > gnu.org, which means "only software the two major definitions agree is > open/free" > > Anyway, we should not turn this list into a gnu.misc.discuss type of > morass (for those of us who remember the days of gnu.misc.discuss... for > all I know it still exists, but I haven't been on usenet in a few > years... ;-)) > I think they all moved to debian-legal. > Havoc -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- "We cannot have a free government without elections; and if the -- rebellion could force us to forgo, or postpone, a national election, -- it might fairly claim to have already conquered us." Abraham Lincoln
