Re: prelink: is it worth it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote:

> But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it :  it
> render impossible to have a
> centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for example)
> or one have to skip from check the prelink binary. Very bad i think.

You pay a security prize if you disable prelink, because it also performs
address space randomization:
http://lwn.net/Articles/190139/

Strange enough this authorative refs, imho, not cited prelink as a security feature
for aslr :=)
http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/200801070918.html

Btw, the reality is more complex this days. Details omitted, this is not a security mailing list.

Regards


Btw. you can also patch the remote integrity checker to use prelink to either
get a checksum of the perlinked binary or undo the prelinking before checking
it.

Regards
Till

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux