Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:33:27PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 23:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > Why was this update marked as security, but not bundled with the package
>> > that actually had the security issue that you were rebuilding for?  When
>> > the entire list of packages is in one email then it makes sense.  Such
>> > as https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1095.html  where all the
>> > packages are listed under one announcement instead of individually.
>> 
>> Because the fedora-package-announce mails are per updated package, not per 
>> grouped update.
>> 
>>         Kevin Kofler
>> 
>> 
>
>
>Perhaps it's time for that to change.  Luke?

I suggest filing a ticket against bodhi instead of assuming this will
magically be seen in the middle of a thread.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux