Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill McGonigle wrote:
> With being tied up with ECMA and the various well-publicized efforts to
> get RAND licenses on them, these aren't the parts most people were
> worried about.

But the thing is, RAND does not necessarily mean royalty-free, let alone 
compatible with Free Software licenses (no royalty-based patent license is, 
and even royalty-free ones can have problematic restrictions). RAND just 
means they won't charge you more just because you like Fedora and hate M$, 
but it doesn't preclude them from charging a fee from every licensor (which 
is inherently incompatible with Free Software: while Free Software is about 
freedom, not cost, having to pay a patent holder for a license is NOT 
considered Free).

        Kevin Kofler


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux