Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue July 7 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:

> Why was this update marked as security, but not bundled with the package
> that actually had the security issue that you were rebuilding for?  When

It was bundled with the packagate that had the security issue:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7976

> the entire list of packages is in one email then it makes sense.  Such
> as https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1095.html  where all the
> packages are listed under one announcement instead of individually.

Yes, but Bodhi does not (or did not?) create such announcements.

Regards
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux