Re: relicensing of Fedora wiki/docs (OPL => CC BY SA)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 07.07.2009 09:58, schrieb Karsten Wade:
> The consensus of the Docs Team, with full Legal support, is to
> relicense wiki and documentation from the deprecated OPL 1.0 to the CC
> BY SA 3.0 license.  This move brings Fedora on to the mainland of free
> and open content; tens of millions of pieces of content and media are
> licensed under the CC BY SA.
>
Simple question:

What are the main diferences beetween OPL 1.0 and the new CC BY SA 3.0
license.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkpTi2YACgkQT2AHK6txfgwqAACghpXpR+0HGwkTxjySxWPqb7zi
t/sAnRDWC/0hM4nsEGWV03xiP4Ff/2lH
=srYB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux