On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:39:24AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > That's your opinion. My opinion is that opensource implies only that > you have access to the source and rights to with it (mostly) as you > like, which doesn't necessarily imply any sort of binary redistribution > right. But your definition is not really close to what is usually meant with Open Source (it's maybe more close to what M$ sometimes suggests it thinks it is ;-)). > Of course, neither of our (or anyone's not officially representing > Fedora) opinions mean squat. True. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
