Hello All! I plan to add arm-toolchain into Fedora and encountered a difficulty - how to properly name the package? From what I found in the Internets, the cross-toolchains *often* named with the following prefix: <arch>-<vendor>-<operating system>-<libc>- For example: i686-pc-linux-gnu- powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu- x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu- http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/?part=1&chap=3 However sometimes they named differently (arm-none-eabi-, arm-uclinuxeabi-, etc). Some cross-compilers already included into Fedora, and their packages naming schemes are also different - some examples of prefixes are arm-gp2x-linux-, avr-, msp430-, spu- (mingw32 differs from others because it, at least, implies target OS and libc). I'm sure, it's time to create unified rules for packaging of cross-toolchains, but right now I'm asking you for help in proper naming of it. Should we name it as <arch>-<vendor>-<operating system>-<libc>-gcc or should we use some other naming schemes? What values should be used for <vendor> - "fedora" maybe? O should we simply drop this field ("unknown")? -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
