On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 09:56 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:24:24AM +0200, drago01 wrote: > > http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/07/06/the-ecma-c-and-cli-standards.aspx > > Oh poo, and what's the difference? None. None whatsoever but more marketing. > > You can't distribute GPL'ed software unless you have the right to do it. > > The promise makes quite sure to tell you you have no right[1], but you can > infringe that they won't sue *you*[2]. I am unable to read the Community Promise in any way that implies either of the above. Please cite exactly which statement in the Community Promise you take issue with. http://www.microsoft.com/interop/cp/default.mspx - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
