On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 10:15 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jos Vos wrote: > And that's why I've been harping on what definition of opensource Fedora > uses. No one has yet to (officially) clarify that. I think it should do it in one of these, by order of preference (first is best): 1. Free Software http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html 2. Debian FSGL http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines 3. Open Source http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php Why I prefer Free Software can be best summarized here: http://www.fsfeurope.org/documents/whyfs.en.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
