Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
a) it will cause some moderate stir-up to those packages whose upstreams
are still abusing the autotools.
s/ab// ;-)
Why can't we just move to a better build system with higher focus on
backwards compatibility?
Because
a) the autotools are not as bad as you in your want to make them appear.
Sorry, but any build system where you can't patch the build system
without risking the sky falling *is* that bad.
Why is it that to build a cmake-based project, it is a given that I run
cmake, but to build an autotools-based project, I am expected to fear
and dread and avoid-at-all-costs running autotools? Do you /really/,
honestly not see anything wrong with that?
As Conrad noted, "[the] phobia of regenerating an auto-generated script
just goes to show how completely broken autotools is."
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
It is training and experience that gives us the ability to abstract
problems, remain objective, use previous knowledge, interact with users,
and herd cats.
-- Celeste Lyn Paul, on Usability Experts
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
