On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:13:45PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > >On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:13:07 +0100, Christopher Brown ><snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx> >wrote: >> Honestly, I'm impressed by your persistence but I think simply trying >> to re-instate Fedora Legacy (which it sounds like this is what you are >> trying to do) is doomed to permanent failure. >> > >I love your argumentation behind this statement; > >Why do you think it's doomed exactly? Is it reasoning following the past >Fedora Legacy initiatives (and failure), or is there anything new? Hyperbole aside, ignoring history doesn't seem prudent. Fedora Legacy (the original one) failed. The last time something like this was proposed, it generated a few meetings and some discussion here and on f-a-b. I have yet to see anything actually come of that. Without a concrete group of people large enough to make this wory saying that they are signing up to do that work, I don't have high hopes for this succeeding in the long run. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
