On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:03:01 +0200, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >> Whether 6 months of additional availability of security updates is going >> to help, and to what extend, we'll have to see. Compared to the current >> situation, that'll give an environment 7 months to upgrade beyond the >> moment that we now call End-Of-Life for a given release and 3 releases to >> choose from -certainly a lot more time then 1 month and 2 releases to >> choose from. > > They already have 7 months of time to move to the next version. It's just > if > they absolutely want to skip a version that they only have 1 month. > True, but consider that moving to Fedora N+1 requires one to reconsider within 6 months. As such I'd say choosing the Fedora N+1 option when Fedora N+2 does not meet ones needs or expectations and one decides to put off on upgrading to Fedora N+2, leaves them with a one month upgrade opportunity after Fedora N+3's GA after all, and so is not exactly without penalty. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
