On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:27:33AM +0200, drago01 wrote: >On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Josh Boyer<jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:46:36PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: >>>On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:21:58AM +0000, Rawhide Report wrote: >>> >>> > kernel-2.6.31-0.42.rc2.fc12 >>> > --------------------------- >>> > * Sat Jul 04 2009 Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> > - 2.6.31-rc1-git11 >>> > >>> > * Sat Jul 04 2009 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.6.31-0.42.rc2 >>> > - 2.6.31-rc2 >>> > >>> > * Fri Jul 03 2009 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> > - Disable v4l1 ov511 and quickcam_messenger drivers (obsoleted by >>> > v4l2 gspca subdrivers) >>> >>>Why is the changelog out of order in the rawhide report? >>>It's the right way around in CVS. >> >> Because the script that generates it doesn't deal with multiple >> entries on the same day properly. It's becoming a common >> question. > >Why does it mess with them at all? It has to do at least _some_ munging, otherwise you don't get the actual "this changed since the last rawhide report" part. >Why not just copy them from the specfile and assume that this is correct? I don't think it operates from CVS, so to get the specfile it would have to unpack the SRPMs. Not very efficient. I believe it just uses the changelog query on the RPM itself. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
