On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:39:44 +0100, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >> The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of >> approximately >> three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it >> turns out to be. This disqualifies the distribution(s) as desktop Linux >> distributions, as desktops tend to need to run the latest and greatest >> for >> as far the latest and greatest lets them. >> >> Does that make sense? > > As a standalone observation, perhaps -- some desktop users often don't > want old, stagnant code; they'd prefer the latest bells and whistles. > > But it makes no sense when considered in conjunction with your apparent > desire for an old, stagnant version of Fedora. > > What makes you think it would be any different? > As described on the Feature page, but if there's any specific questions about the reasoning on there I'll be happy to answer those questions. -- Jeroen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
