On 07/04/2009 03:56 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Jussi Lehtola wrote: >> Quoting "Ralf Corsepius" <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Yes, utf-8 awareness had been a review criterion since the earliest >>> Fedora days. >> >> No. What you are thinking of is spec files and rpm filenames (and >> documentation that is in non-ASCII character set). > > No, I am talking about applications and libraries, not about documentation. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines You claim that UTF-8 awareness is a review criteria. However I find no record of that. The only thing in the guidelines is "MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8" This is what is noted in the packaging guidelines as well. Can you provide a reference to what you claim? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
