On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:52:35 +0530, Rahul wrote: > On 07/02/2009 06:58 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > > +1 on the Books idea > > Does this look ok? > > --- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-07-02 15:39:02.000000000 +0530 > +++ comps-f12.xml.in 2009-07-02 19:49:32.108616562 +0530 > @@ -520,6 +520,17 @@ > </packagelist> > </group> > <group> > + <id>books</id> > + <_name>Technical Books</_name> > + <_description/> > + <default>false</default> > + <uservisible>true</uservisible> > + <packagelist> > + <packagereq type="default">diveintopython</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="default">ldd-pdf</packagereq> > + </packagelist> > + </group> > + <group> > <id>buildsys-build</id> > <_name>Buildsystem building group</_name> > <_description/> > > Rahul No, it doesn't. First of all, in my opinion it doesn't make sense to separate "books" from other forms of documentation. Secondly, "samba-doc" is missing in above package list, and there are probably more "books" included in other packages. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
