Re: ppc64 assistance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
>>>
>>> Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
>>> build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
>>> automake).
>>
>> With V=1
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1450335&name=build.log
>
> AFAIS, your spec doesn't seem to pass RPM_OPT_FLAGS correctly, as well as
> does the package seems to play dirty games with CFLAGS. I haven't checked
> details, though.
>
> FWIW: Build breakdowns on ppc64 often are caused by not passing
> RPM_OPT_FLAGS correctly or a package playing dirty games with
> CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS.

The dirty games were to try and work out this issue with PPC64 (it
built fine on the rest of them) and it seems your right with the dirty
CFLAGS game as it broke other previous working ones. This rev of the
spec file was the one that worked on all but ppc64.

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gobject-introspection/devel/gobject-introspection.spec?revision=1.9&view=markup

Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux