On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:53:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/02/2009 08:51 PM, David wrote: > > > I disagree that Fedora should be packaging books, both of these can > > easily be downloaded via web. > > Why package something that has no dependencies? > > We package hundreds of things that have no dependencies and can be > downloaded easily via web including fonts. That is not a argument. Arguably, this particular content can be helpful for cultivating contribution, i.e. training developers. Perhaps there is a reasonably objective standard to be found there for content, but I'm not sure it captures everything we hope to include in the future. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
