Re: Fedora Core 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

For Firefox (32bit) from fedora.us I needed no special libs from iX86 on x86_64.

You'd be mistaken. It will need a whole bunch of i.86 libs: glibc, various X related libraries, freetype, various GTK related libs, libstdc++.


These ix86 RPMs come on the CDs admittedly (or are, strangely, located in the x86_64 arch RPM directory on fedora.us), and are installed by default but they're still i.86. The problem is that many many of these RPMs contain non-arch-specific files. Maybe yum uses --nodoc and --prefix when installing them, but i doubt it. The real problem though is where you need or want to install both i386 and x86_64 versions of an RPM or library RPMs that install binaries to (/usr)?/bin.

Yes, often, this is annoying. QT had such a problem also IIRC. Was hard
to get a 32bit xine run on an 64bit FC2 (now there are 64bit xine
available at livna.org this is easier again)... But I don't think /usr/
bin64 or something like that is specified somewhere (LSB)? Maybe this
could be solved by
/usr/bin/qtconfig-32
/usr/bin/qtconfig-64
and a script or link that points to the right Version?

bin64 is the only sane way really.

CU
thl

regards, -- Paul Jakma paul@xxxxxxxx paul@xxxxxxxxx Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to spam@xxxxxxxxxx Fortune: 186,282 miles per second: It isn't just a good idea, it's the law!



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux