Hello,
I noticed a bunch of mingw32*-debuginfo packages that contain only *.debug (no
sources, no build id) appeared in Rawhide. Is this how mingw32 debuginfo
packages are supposed to look like, or is the infrastructure for creating the
debuginfo packages not quite complete, or are these packaging bugs?
mingw32-boost-debuginfo-1.39.0-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-cairomm-debuginfo-1.8.0-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-glib2-debuginfo-2.21.2-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-glibmm24-debuginfo-2.20.0-4.fc12.noarch
mingw32-gtkmm24-debuginfo-2.16.0-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libglade2-debuginfo-2.6.4-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libglademm24-debuginfo-2.6.7-7.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libgnurx-debuginfo-2.5.1-5.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libsigc++20-debuginfo-2.2.2-8.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libsqlite3x-debuginfo-20071018-8.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libxml++-debuginfo-2.26.0-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-pangomm-debuginfo-2.24.0-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-plotmm-debuginfo-0.1.2-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-qt-debuginfo-4.5.2-1.fc12.noarch
mingw32-qwt-debuginfo-5.1.1-8.fc12.noarch
mingw32-sqlite-debuginfo-3.6.14.2-1.fc12.noarch
mingw32-tcl-debuginfo-8.5.7-6.fc12.noarch
mingw32-wpcap-debuginfo-4.1.beta5-6.fc12.noarch
mingw32-zfstream-debuginfo-20041202-6.fc12.noarch
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
