Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote: > > Owen Taylor wrote: > > > I was rather surprised to see: > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661 > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076 > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6370 > > > > > > Where the automake was upgraded to 1.11 for F9, F10, and F11. > > > > Upgrade on F-11 (and F-10) was requested because there are some projects > > (like gnulib/coreutils) which really need automake 1.11 for build in > > latest stable versions. > > Is there a bug report with details of this gnulib/coreutils request? Not really, it was just direct irl/irc/mail communication with automake/autoconf fedora maintainers&comaintainers. First request was only about 1.10b in rawhide (after f-12 split) - as I needed at least 1.10b to build coreutils-7.4 there (otherwise only with an ugly hack). Greetings, Ondřej Vašík
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
