Re: ethereal update package broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:34 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:

Bleh. It should fail to build completely, not do this silliness. How do I
tell what the match should be? Is adding `libtoolize --force` to the prep
section of the spec file really the correct fix? (Because it seems to
work...)


Throwing out the autocrap mess altogether and writing proper makefiles
would seem to be a more correct fix.



Just to keep everyone posted, i've "fixed" the build, and development already has a fixed version out, i just need to finish up the proper errata stuff for FC2 etc., so it's taking a couple of days longer there.


Read ya, Phil

--
Philipp Knirsch      | Tel.:  +49-711-96437-470
Development          | Fax.:  +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH         | Email: Phil Knirsch <phil@xxxxxxxxx>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web:   http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
Motd:  You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux