On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 17:02 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 09:22 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > > > I think balsa is a nice, simple MUA and I generally recommend it for users > > that I install Linux for. I'm not a fan of the current Outlook/Evolution > > approach. Having said that, balsa is a great candidate for Fedora Extras. > > If people want to reduce the size of Fedora Core (this opinion seems to > > be pretty much unanimous) then we need to start making compromises like > > this. > > The problem with most MUAs, is that they don't support advanced > features, like SASL authentication (CRAM-MD5, Kerberos, X.509, etc) or > disconnected (offline) operation when using IMAP. That's one of the > reasons I keep using Evolution, since I *need* Kerberos authentication > support to access my IMAP mailbox. AFAIK, only Pine does also support > Kerberos authentication via SASL. Mutt supports it too, FWIW.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
