Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> drago01 (drago01@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
>> Moving to i686 is fine, non i686 chips are mostly dead (but the
>> perfomance gain from moving to i686 from i586 is questionable at
>> best).

> ... how so? It's consistently 1-2% in reasonable benchmarks (real-world
> code, albeit cpu-specific).

I don't understand how this proposal can survive even momentary
consideration.  We're going to cut off some nontrivial fraction
of our userbase to get 1-2% speedup for the rest?

As was already mentioned, the people who need speed are probably
on x86_64 already.  The x86 builds are for legacy hardware *now*,
and should be understood as such.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux