Re: bind-chroot in F11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:21:11PM +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> I checked the contents of the bind-chroot package in both F10 and f11
> -  as I was puzzled about running bind-chroot since things seemed
> rather different to previous behaviour.
> 
> In F11 the contents contain
> /var/named/chroot and within this directory are
> /dev containing file null, random and zero
> and /etc containing file localtime
> and nothing else.
> 
> In F10 the contents contain
> /usr/sbin/bind-chroot-admin
> and /var/named/chroot and within this directory are
> /dev containing file null, random and zero
> /etc/ containing files named.conf, named.rfc1912.zones and rndc.key
> /var/ containing log/named.log
> and also containing named/ containing named.ca, named.empty,
> named.localhost and named.loopback
> 
> So this is a big difference in the bind-chroot package in F11 - with
> lots "not there" compared to F10
> 
> Can anyone enlighten me on why there is such a huge difference? Has
> there been some fundamental policy change since F10?

Original story is here:
http://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=63613&forum=11

I agree that current state of bind-chroot package is not ideal (as
reported on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504596) but
I'm working on it.

Regards, Adam

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux