Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/15/2009 03:52 AM +9:00:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472622
Reported in Nov 2008.
Is it really that difficult to fix it?
Well, actually these two packages are _the same_ (currently
versions of rpms on Fedora are different, however)
The difference is that ruby-sqlite3 creates non-gem ruby module,
while rubygem-sqlite3-ruby creates ruby gem.
Curret ruby packaging guideline says that [1]
"
Packaging for Gem and non-Gem use
If the same Ruby library is to be packaged for use as a Gem and
as a straight Ruby library without Gem support, it must be packaged
as a Gem first.
"
And we have the way and allow to create non-gem ruby module (rpm) packages
as a subpackage of a package based on rubygem. So for this case
ruby-sqlite3 "srpm" must be obsoleted by rubygem-sqlite3-ruby "srpm" and
ruby-sqlite3 "binary rpm" should be created as the subpackage of
rubygem-sqlite3-ruby.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Packaging_for_Gem_and_non-Gem_use
Regards,
Mamoru
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
